8/14主要任務
|
進展與困難
|
找出 model
papers涵蓋研究目的
|
已補齊之前model paper
所缺乏驗證的心理計量特性,整理於下,
有找到幾篇因素分析文獻,有些是多因素,要再了解它們為何也驗證內部一致性。
|
Model paper閱讀
|
還未開始。
|
下周主要任務
|
目標
|
Model
paper閱讀
|
整理出及參考最重要model
papers, 寫研究程序
|
之前Model papers缺乏的部分: MDC, practice effect ,dimensionality
目前經搜索及篩選後可再參考的文獻:
MDC 部分:
1.
Vancampfort D,
Probst M, Sweers K, Maurissen K, Knapen J, De Hert M. Reliability, minimal
detectable changes, practice effects and correlates of the 6-min walk test in
patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2011;187:62-67
驗證之心理計量特性:test-retest
reliability (ICC)
minimal detectable changes
practice effect
對象:schizophrenia
Practice effect部分:
1.
Lee P, Li
PC, Liu CH, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reliability of two attention tests in
schizophrenia. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2011;26:405-411
驗證之心理計量特性:
1 week test–retest reliability (ICC)
practice effects
對象:stable schizophrenia
2.
Conway Greig T,
Nicholls SS, Wexler BE, Bell MD. Test-retest stability of neuropsychological
testing and individual differences in variability in schizophrenia outpatients.
Psychiatry Res. 2004;129:241-247
驗證之心理計量特性:test-retest reliability(ICC, pearson r)
Practice effect
Change scores
對象:Stable schizophrenia
3.
Keefe RS, Fox KH,
Harvey PD, Cucchiaro J, Siu C, Loebel A. Characteristics of the matrics
consensus cognitive battery in a 29-site antipsychotic schizophrenia clinical
trial. Schizophr. Res. 2011;125:161-168
驗證之心理計量特性:test–retest reliability
practice effects
ecological validity
對象:stable schizophrenia
4.
Leifker FR, Patterson TL, Bowie CR, Mausbach BT,
Harvey PD. Psychometric properties of performance-based measurements of
functional capacity: Test-retest reliability, practice effects, and potential
sensitivity to change. Schizophr. Res. 2010;119:246-252
驗證之心理計量特性:Test–retest
reliability(長期追蹤)
practice effects
potential sensitivity to change
對象:schizophrenia
Dimensionality部分:
1.
Livesey A, Dodd K, Pote H, Marlow E. Exploring
the reliability and validity of the social–moral awareness test. Journal of
Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2012;25:553-570
驗證之心理計量特性:Principal
component analysis :unidimensional
in structure
Inter-rater reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha)
Convergent validity
Discriminant validity
對象:individuals with learning disabilities
2.
Galinsky AM, Cagney
KA, Browning CR. Is collective efficacy age graded? The development and
evaluation of a new measure of collective efficacy for older adults. Journal
of Aging Research. 2012;2012:360254
驗證之心理計量特性:Principal components factor analysis: one latent factor
internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha)
Criterion and Convergent Validity
對象:Older adults
3.
Dagnan D, Hull A,
McDonnell A. The controllability beliefs scale used with carers of people with intellectual
disabilities: Psychometric properties. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res.
2013;57:422-428
驗證之心理計量特性:Principal components factor analysis: two-factor structure
2-to 4-week test–retest reliability(pearson r)
internal reliability
concurrent and convergent
validity
對象:carers of people with IDs
4. Hausberg MC, Schulz H, Piegler T, Happach CG, Klopper M,
Brutt AL, et al. Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization
in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the
mentalization questionnaire (mzq). Psychotherapy research : journal of the
Society for Psychotherapy Research. 2012;22:699-70
驗證之心理計量特性:
item analysis (including frequencies, item difficulty, item discrimination,skewness, kurtosis, and floor and ceiling effects)
principal components analysis: four factors
confirmatory factor analysis
Test-retest reliability
Internal consistency.
Criterion-related validity
Convergent and divergent validity
對象:Mental disorder(mainly affective
disorder, personality disorder)
因素分析暫不考量,那太複雜。
回覆刪除了解!
刪除model papers 請重新彙整,如 Aug. 14 blog 之表格
回覆刪除總共篇數 >=4 篇